Rules of competence and judgment in substantive implementation problems

Rules of competence and judgment in substantive implementation problems

Blog Article

As the original procedure for the execution of the judgment is easy and easy as the execution stage is the last stage of litigation, it may occur that a dispute or problems related to implementation may arise as substantive problems in which a substantive judgment is required to settle the dispute in the origin of the disputed right, Other brands whether the dispute is based.To procedural or objective reasons.It was found after the research and analysis that the substantive problems facing the implementation, which did not have an independent regulation in the Jordanian implementation law applied to what is applied to the rest of the problems such as the temporal in terms of procedures and the competent authority, and then judged and subjected to the general rules in some matters and procedures as a case ( Objective) intended to separate the dispute and resolve the Acrylic Family Puzzle issue.

The study concluded that there is insufficient legal regulation regarding the substantive disputes.We hope that the Jordanian legislator will address these problems independently by means of texts that are unique to them and identify them and establish legal rules governing them.